Terence Tao: AI's Efficiency Threatens the Childlike Wonder That Drives Mathematics

All grown-ups were once children… but only few of them remember it

In a three-part Mastodon thread, mathematician Terence Tao argues that curiosity-driven play—like children inventing 'plus one' to win a number game—is essential to serious mathematics. He warns that modern AI tools, aimed at solving designated problems, can capture flags and score goals but at the cost of lessons learned, insights gained, and unexpected discoveries. Tao urges us to remember what it is like to be a child.

The flag is captured, the goal scored, and the problem is solved; but at the cost of lessons learned, insights gained, collaborations formed, and new targets located.
  1. burticlies

    I see this clearly at kids birthday parties whenever there is a piñata. Adults hate them. All they see is the goal and the incredibly inefficient path the kids are taking towards it.

    But the kids love it, they don’t care when they miss, they are just enjoying hitting something with a stick. And every miss heightens the excitement for the eventual lolly scramble.

  2. HenrikPontoppid

    I remember reading once about how Astrid Lindgren's children's books were supreme exactly because she - contrary to many others - remembers what it is like to be a child. Not just what you did or thought when you were a child - how it felt. The endless curiosity and appreciation for what in an adult's eyes is trivial is really a special thing I hope most people carry throughout their lives. On the other hand, children also understand more than one would normally think, essentially a Moravec's paradox but in relation to adults.

    "Children heal the soul" - Dostoevsky

  3. mlsu

    I think Tao correctly sees the problem with AI. It’s not that it is ineffective or has weaknesses. It’s that it’s not human.

    Like, it ought to be enough to say that the problem with AI is that it’s not human. Unfortunately, we live in a world where many (most?) people have willingly put away the childish things, so as to achieve some goal.

    The problem is that the point of life is to explore and have fun and have human to human experiences. I think math is probably fun because you’re working on hard problems with your collaborators.

    It should be obvious to everyone, as it is to children, that the point of life isn’t the goal, the point is the experience one has of living. They say that when you die the only thing you lose is the current moment. The problem with AI is that it doesn’t have a current moment to live in or to lose, it’s an inanimate thing. So, it should be obvious to everyone that the problem with the AI is that it’s not human. Alas.

  4. ryuuseijin

    This reminds me of a video I saw from Alan Watts [1] where he talks about how from childhood it is hammered into our minds that we must work we must do this or do that or we will be punished. And he talks about how you can choose to change your perspective or mindset and see work as a form of play, where you live in the moment.

    This is probably harder to do than to say, but this video resonated with me because your mindset is something you do have control over, and choosing not to get stressed about work, and choosing not to take things "seriously" and choosing not to do something for the outcome but just for performing the act, just like you would play music (an example he gave) or to see it as a game is something you can do.

    [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9BXvBJ2dWo

  5. pred_

    He also just published this one: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/09/07/finite-time-blowup...

    While his concerns expressed here aren't new, it looks like the recent cases of scientific misconduct were enough to push for urgency:

    > But in the immediate term, the most pressing issue is for the entire mathematical community to unite around our core values and objectives, and reject irresponsible and unsustainable usages of AI technology that only serve to advance nominal goals rather than the true underlying goals of the field.

  6. palmotea

    > But modern AI tools, when directed without such expert supervision, can now be aimed all too easily at the ostensible goals of the field, without any incentive to take the slow, whimsical path.

    IMHO, that's the whole point of AI: automate the fun, to leave people with more drudgery. Worker! Spend less (ideally no) time doing creative things like coding, spend your time instead doing code review!

  7. Lifetrajectory

    Your approach helps expand our children's imaginations to such an extent that they learn to think outside the box even at the preschool age, which will enable them to make better decisions in their lives.

  8. helpfulmandrill

    I can remember a lot from being a child. Mostly a sense of frustration and powerlessness.

    But also the way in which things seemed more interesting than they do now. Like I could be fascinated by watching a tree sway in the wind in a way which wouldn't happen now - at least, not without conscious, meditation style effort. I remember when an hour seemed like an almost intolerably long stretch of time.

    I also remember loads of events in visual detail, though I'm terrible at remembering when they happened.

More from this day

2026-09-10