A student tackled her through a classroom door. Then everyone shrugged.

Has Violence Against Teachers Become Accepted by Society?

A student tackled her through a classroom door. Then everyone shrugged.

Dr. Elizabeth Martin was 22, a new mother, when a high-school student tackled her through a classroom door. The surgeries and recovery lasted years — but what stunned her more was the reaction: sympathy laced with resignation, as if teacher assault were simply part of the job. The student's parents sued the district, and she found herself answering attorneys' questions about whether she had done enough to stop it. Drawing on American Psychological Association surveys showing violence against educators rose after the pandemic, Martin argues that normalizing abuse sends teachers a devastating message.

Until we stop responding to teacher assaults with "that's just teaching these days," we will continue sending educators a devastating message: we know you are being hurt, and we have decided that hurting you is normal.
  1. ValueTheory

    "The parents of the student who assaulted me sued the district, claiming it had failed to prevent the incident. Suddenly, I found myself on phone calls with administrators and attorneys questioning whether I had done enough to stop the assault."

    This is the root of the problem. Of course, civil lawsuits are important to correct actual wrongs, but school districts seem to be so cowardly in the face of bad lawsuits that they are willing to throw teachers under the bus to avoid them.

  2. t1234s

    Having been a student in the mid-late 90s in US public school I can say I witnessed this often. Public schools are storage facilities for delinquent kids with useless parents. These people are a waste of tax money to try and educate. After a certain amount of incidents they should be removed from the public school system and left with the parents to deal with. Instead the public school is forced to try and deal with these delinquents. They take time and resources away from the smarter youth who are trying to do the best they can in the public school system.

  3. Ambolia

    That the whole article can be seen as a masterpiece of talking around the obvious while avoiding stepping on the mine. Obvious rules cannot be applied systematically because certain government metrics would look bad. Goodhart's law, any explicit metric will be immediately optimized. And this is people optimizing metrics as best as they can in play. I'll leave the obvious as an exercise for the reader.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

  4. jandrewrogers

    I went to a high school in California. The school district had a separate dedicated campus where they sent all of the violent and antisocial kids in the rest of the school district. They weren’t hesitant to use it either, repeat offenders weren’t a thing. All of us were aware of it.

    The antisocial kids sent to this school received focused, dedicated attention in an environment where they were minimally disruptive and with much higher staffing ratios. The kids in the rest of the school district were never exposed to this behavior because antisocial kids were identified early and removed quickly. It was and is widely regarded as one of the top-tier school districts in California.

    I consider it a solved problem. Yet many people will argue that this is bad actually even though it is demonstrably effective at the nominal objective.

  5. phishin

    Through my observations this has been completely normalized and with terrible pay as a reward. The justification is that it’s the students’ home life causing it and the teachers are there to fill in as a stable adult.

    This is at a tipping point.

  6. armchairhacker

    My understanding is that it’s normalized by administrators, and the public doesn’t think much about it. Another issue is that some schools have heavy police presence and prison-like rules.

    I think a solution to both is to expel students who, for example, assault other students or teachers. Other commenters are blaming parents, and sure we should incentivize and facilitate better parenting, but in the short term what is more successful at reducing violence is expelling violent students.

  7. 7sigma

    I remember James Talarico talking about how a very aggressive student completely transformed from an angry kid into a thriving one once he had the therapy and support. Of course republicans cut the funding and the therapy ended and he was eventually expelled.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/x2PsFWrwCDI

    I know its a single data point, but I think those situations would happen a lot less if students had access to the right support.

  8. wxw

    > My experience made something painfully clear: violence against educators has become so normalized that society now treats it as an expected part of teaching.

    I don’t think this is normalized at all.

    Something about the ad-riddled website and way this is written makes me wonder if this is even a real article.

  9. moduspol

    Probably not a popular opinion but I feel the same way about police officers. Teachers aren't the cause of the vast majority of this, they're just the front line of people who have to deal with it. If it weren't educators, it'd just be whoever these dysfunctional kids / parents run up against next.

    And sometimes those are police officers, who then get blamed for metrics we don't like. So we cut back on policing and now it'll be somebody else who gets the short end of the stick.

  10. johnobrien1010

    This article so very poorly written, to the point that I wonder whether this is real or just AI generated. One whole sentence in the 2nd paragraph is repeated nearly verbatim in the 3rd. In addition, I can't find the author elsewhere online. There is an Elizabeth Martin who comes up as a writer, but she is a script-writer. I am not sure that this is a real story. Is anyone else skeptical about the validity of this article?

More from this day

2026-09-28